<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3 Sem Pro" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy Does Not Use Magnets</title>
	<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 Sem Pro</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: prospective, randomized and double blind study. (magnetic necklace)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/92</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/92#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;


  
Related Articles


Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: prospective, randomized and double blind study.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Jun;16(6):595-601
Authors:  Benazzo F, Zanon G, Pederzini L, Modonesi F, Cardile C, Falez F, Ciolli L, La Cava F, Giannini S, Buda R, Setti S, Caruso G, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18385980&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0519-9"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--production.springer.de-OnlineResources-Logos-springerlink.gif" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&amp;pubmedid=18385980"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov-corehtml-pmc-pmcgifs-pubmed-pmc.gif" border="0"/></a> </td>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18385980">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: prospective, randomized and double blind study.</b></p>
<p>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Jun;16(6):595-601</p>
<p>Authors:  Benazzo F, Zanon G, Pederzini L, Modonesi F, Cardile C, Falez F, Ciolli L, La Cava F, Giannini S, Buda R, Setti S, Caruso G, Massari L</p>
<p>Pre-clinical studies have shown that treatment by pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) can limit the catabolic effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines on articular cartilage and favour the anabolic activity of the chondrocytes. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is usually performed by arthroscopic procedure that, even if minimally invasive, may elicit an inflammatory joint reaction detrimental to articular cartilage. In this study the effect of I-ONE PEMFs treatment in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction was investigated. The study end-points were (1) evaluation of patients&#039; functional recovery by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form; (2) use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), necessary to control joint pain and inflammation. The study design was prospective, randomized and double blind. Sixty-nine patients were included in the study at baseline. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30, 60 and 180 days, followed by 2-year follow-up interview. Patients were evaluated by IKDC Form and were asked to report on the use of NSAIDs. Patients were randomized to active or placebo treatments; active device generated a magnetic field of 1.5 mT at 75 Hz. Patients were instructed to use the stimulator (I-ONE) for 4 h per day for 60 days. All patients underwent ACL reconstruction with use of quadruple hamstrings semitendinosus and gracilis technique. At baseline there were no differences in the IKDC scores between the two groups. At follow-up visits the SF-36 Health Survey score showed a statistically significant faster recovery in the group of patients treated with I-ONE stimulator (P &lt; 0.05). NSAIDs use was less frequent among active patients than controls (P &lt; 0.05). Joint swelling resolution and return to normal range of motion occurred faster in the active treated group (P &lt; 0.05) too. The 2-year follow-up did not shown statistically significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore for longitudinal analysis the generalized linear mixed effects model was applied to calculate the group x time interaction coefficient; this interaction showed a significant difference (P &lt; 0.0001) between the active and placebo groups for all investigated variables: SF-36 Health Survey, IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation and VAS. Twenty-nine patients (15 in the active group; 14 in the placebo group) underwent both ACL reconstruction and meniscectomy; when they were analysed separately the differences in SF-36 Health Survey scores between the two groups were larger then what observed in the whole study group (P &lt; 0.05). The results of this study show that patient&#039;s functional recovery occurs earlier in the active group. No side effects were observed and the treatment was well tolerated. The use of I-ONE should always be considered after ACL reconstruction, particularly in professional athletes, to shorten the recovery time, to limit joint inflammatory reaction and its catabolic effects on articular cartilage and ultimately for joint preservation.</p>
<p>PMID: 18385980 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>
<p> 
<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=19015858&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=19015858">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</b></p>
<p>Rheumatol Int. 2008 Nov 18;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ay S, Evcik D</p>
<p>In this study, we planned to investigate the effects of pulse electromagnetic field (PEMF) on pain relief and functional capacity of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Fifty-five patients with knee OA were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the therapy, there was statistically significant improvement in pain scores in both groups (P &lt; 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed within the groups (P &gt; 0.05). We observed statistically significant improvement in some of the subgroups of Lequesne index. These are morning stiffness and activities of daily living activities compared to placebo group. However, we could not observe statistically significant differences in total of the scale between two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Applying between-group analysis, we were unable to demonstrate a beneficial symptomatic effect of PEMF in the treatment of knee OA in all patients. Further studies using different types of magnetic devices, treatment protocols and patient populations are warranted to confirm the general efficacy of PEMF therapy in OA and other conditions.</p>
<p>PMID: 19015858 PubMed - as supplied by publisher</p>

<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>magnetic necklace</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/92/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. (magnetic bracelets)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/91</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/91#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Rheumatol Int. 2008 Nov 18;
Authors:  Ay S, Evcik D
In this study, we planned to investigate the effects of pulse electromagnetic field (PEMF) on pain relief and functional capacity of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Fifty-five patients with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=19015858&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=19015858">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</b></p>
<p>Rheumatol Int. 2008 Nov 18;</p>
<p>Authors:  Ay S, Evcik D</p>
<p>In this study, we planned to investigate the effects of pulse electromagnetic field (PEMF) on pain relief and functional capacity of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Fifty-five patients with knee OA were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the therapy, there was statistically significant improvement in pain scores in both groups (P &lt; 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed within the groups (P &gt; 0.05). We observed statistically significant improvement in some of the subgroups of Lequesne index. These are morning stiffness and activities of daily living activities compared to placebo group. However, we could not observe statistically significant differences in total of the scale between two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Applying between-group analysis, we were unable to demonstrate a beneficial symptomatic effect of PEMF in the treatment of knee OA in all patients. Further studies using different types of magnetic devices, treatment protocols and patient populations are warranted to confirm the general efficacy of PEMF therapy in OA and other conditions.</p>
<p>PMID: 19015858 PubMed - as supplied by publisher</p>
<p> 
<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18385980&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: prospective, randomized and double blind study.</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0519-9"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--production.springer.de-OnlineResources-Logos-springerlink.gif" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&amp;pubmedid=18385980"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov-corehtml-pmc-pmcgifs-pubmed-pmc.gif" border="0"/></a> </td>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18385980">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effects of biophysical stimulation in patients undergoing arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: prospective, randomized and double blind study.</b></p>
<p>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Jun;16(6):595-601</p>
<p>Authors:  Benazzo F, Zanon G, Pederzini L, Modonesi F, Cardile C, Falez F, Ciolli L, La Cava F, Giannini S, Buda R, Setti S, Caruso G, Massari L</p>
<p>Pre-clinical studies have shown that treatment by pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) can limit the catabolic effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines on articular cartilage and favour the anabolic activity of the chondrocytes. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is usually performed by arthroscopic procedure that, even if minimally invasive, may elicit an inflammatory joint reaction detrimental to articular cartilage. In this study the effect of I-ONE PEMFs treatment in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction was investigated. The study end-points were (1) evaluation of patients&#039; functional recovery by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form; (2) use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), necessary to control joint pain and inflammation. The study design was prospective, randomized and double blind. Sixty-nine patients were included in the study at baseline. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30, 60 and 180 days, followed by 2-year follow-up interview. Patients were evaluated by IKDC Form and were asked to report on the use of NSAIDs. Patients were randomized to active or placebo treatments; active device generated a magnetic field of 1.5 mT at 75 Hz. Patients were instructed to use the stimulator (I-ONE) for 4 h per day for 60 days. All patients underwent ACL reconstruction with use of quadruple hamstrings semitendinosus and gracilis technique. At baseline there were no differences in the IKDC scores between the two groups. At follow-up visits the SF-36 Health Survey score showed a statistically significant faster recovery in the group of patients treated with I-ONE stimulator (P &lt; 0.05). NSAIDs use was less frequent among active patients than controls (P &lt; 0.05). Joint swelling resolution and return to normal range of motion occurred faster in the active treated group (P &lt; 0.05) too. The 2-year follow-up did not shown statistically significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore for longitudinal analysis the generalized linear mixed effects model was applied to calculate the group x time interaction coefficient; this interaction showed a significant difference (P &lt; 0.0001) between the active and placebo groups for all investigated variables: SF-36 Health Survey, IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation and VAS. Twenty-nine patients (15 in the active group; 14 in the placebo group) underwent both ACL reconstruction and meniscectomy; when they were analysed separately the differences in SF-36 Health Survey scores between the two groups were larger then what observed in the whole study group (P &lt; 0.05). The results of this study show that patient&#039;s functional recovery occurs earlier in the active group. No side effects were observed and the treatment was well tolerated. The use of I-ONE should always be considered after ACL reconstruction, particularly in professional athletes, to shorten the recovery time, to limit joint inflammatory reaction and its catabolic effects on articular cartilage and ultimately for joint preservation.</p>
<p>PMID: 18385980 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>

<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>magnetic therapy for pain</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/91/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome (magnetic jewelry)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/90</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/90#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61
Authors: 
Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18833174&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18833174">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome</b></p>
<p>Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic therapy. The comparison of the efficacy of treatment in patients of the main and control groups revealed the benefits of transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy in CNS function, performance on memory and attention tests, state of autonomic nervous system and psychoemotional state of patients (the reduction of anxiety and depression).</p>
<p>PMID: 18833174 PubMed - in process</p>
<p>
<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>magnetic jewelry</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/90/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging. (copper bracelets)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/89</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/89#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.
Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3748-58
Authors:  McDannold N, Maier SE
Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging is an elastography method developed for ultrasound imaging that maps displacements produced by focused ultrasound pulses systematically applied to different locations. The resulting images are &#034;stiffness weighted&#034; and yield information about local mechanical tissue properties. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777934&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777934">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.</b></p>
<p>Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3748-58</p>
<p>Authors:  McDannold N, Maier SE</p>
<p>Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging is an elastography method developed for ultrasound imaging that maps displacements produced by focused ultrasound pulses systematically applied to different locations. The resulting images are &#034;stiffness weighted&#034; and yield information about local mechanical tissue properties. Here, the feasibility of magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) was tested. Quasistatic MR elastography was used to measure focal displacements using a one-dimensional MRI pulse sequence. A 1.63 or 1.5 MHz transducer supplied ultrasound pulses which were triggered by the magnetic resonance imaging hardware to occur before a displacement-encoding gradient. Displacements in and around the focus were mapped in a tissue-mimicking phantom and in an ex vivo bovine kidney. They were readily observed and increased linearly with acoustic power in the phantom (R2=0.99). At higher acoustic power levels, the displacement substantially increased and was associated with irreversible changes in the phantom. At these levels, transverse displacement components could also be detected. Displacements in the kidney were also observed and increased after thermal ablation. While the measurements need validation, the authors have demonstrated the feasibility of detecting small displacements induced by low-power ultrasound pulses using an efficient magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequence that is compatible with tracking of a dynamically steered ultrasound focal spot, and that the displacement increases with acoustic power. MR-ARFI has potential for elastography or to guide ultrasound therapies that use low-power pulsed ultrasound exposures, such as drug delivery.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777934 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>
<p> 
<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777606&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&amp;sid=nlm:pubmed&amp;issn=1526-2375&amp;date=2008&amp;volume=9&amp;issue=5&amp;spage=493"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www3.interscience.wiley.com-aboutus-images-wiley_interscience_150x34.gif" border="0"/></a> </td>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777606">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.</b></p>
<p>Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-504</p>
<p>Authors:  Weintraub MI, Cole SP</p>
<p>OBJECTIVE: To determine if a physics-based combination of simultaneous static and time-varying dynamic magnetic field stimulation to the wrist 4 hours/day for 2 months can reduce subjective neuropathic pain and influence objective electrophysiologic parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 36 symptomatic hands. Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) and neuropathic pain scale (NPS) scores at baseline and 2 months and a Patient&#039;s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire at the end of 2 months. Secondary endpoints were neurologic examination, median nerve distal latencies (compound muscle action potential CMAP/sensory nerve action potential SNAP), dynamometry, pinch gauge readings, and current perception threshold (CPT) scores. An &#034;active&#034; device was provided gratis at the end of the study, with 15 subjects voluntarily remaining within the open protocol an additional 2-10 months and using the preselected primary and secondary parameters. RESULTS: (two months). Of the 31 hands, 25 (13 magnet, 12 sham) had moderate to severe pain (VAS &gt; 4). The VAS and PGIC revealed a nonsignificant pain reduction. NPS analyses (anova) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of &#034;deep&#034; pain (35% downward arrow vs 12% upward arrow, P = 0.018), NPS Total Composite (decreases of 42% vs 24%, P = 0.042), NPS Total Descriptor Score (NPS 8; 43% vs 24%), and NPS 4 (42% vs 11%). Motor strength, CMAP/SNAP, and CPT scores were not significantly changed. Of the 15 hands with up to 10 months of active PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic fields) exposure, there was objective improvement in nerve conduction (CMAP = 53%, SNAP = 40%, &gt;1 SD), and subjective improvement on examination (40%), pain scores (50%), and PGIC (70%). No detectable changes in motor strength and CPT. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF exposure in refractory CTS provides statistically significant short- and longterm pain reduction and mild improvement in objective neuronal functions. Neuromodulation appears to influence nociceptive-C and large A-fiber functions, probably through ion/ligand binding.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777606 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>

<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>bio magnetic therapy</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/89/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome (magnetic health)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/88</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61
Authors: 
Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18833174&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18833174">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome</b></p>
<p>Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic therapy. The comparison of the efficacy of treatment in patients of the main and control groups revealed the benefits of transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy in CNS function, performance on memory and attention tests, state of autonomic nervous system and psychoemotional state of patients (the reduction of anxiety and depression).</p>
<p>PMID: 18833174 PubMed - in process</p>
<p>
<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>bioflow</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/88/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome. (magnetic therapy jewelry)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/87</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/87#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;


 
Related Articles


A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.
Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-504
Authors:  Weintraub MI, Cole SP
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a physics-based combination of simultaneous static and time-varying dynamic magnetic field stimulation to the wrist 4 hours/day for 2 months can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777606&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&amp;sid=nlm:pubmed&amp;issn=1526-2375&amp;date=2008&amp;volume=9&amp;issue=5&amp;spage=493"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www3.interscience.wiley.com-aboutus-images-wiley_interscience_150x34.gif" border="0"/></a> </td>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777606">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.</b></p>
<p>Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-504</p>
<p>Authors:  Weintraub MI, Cole SP</p>
<p>OBJECTIVE: To determine if a physics-based combination of simultaneous static and time-varying dynamic magnetic field stimulation to the wrist 4 hours/day for 2 months can reduce subjective neuropathic pain and influence objective electrophysiologic parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 36 symptomatic hands. Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) and neuropathic pain scale (NPS) scores at baseline and 2 months and a Patient&#039;s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire at the end of 2 months. Secondary endpoints were neurologic examination, median nerve distal latencies (compound muscle action potential CMAP/sensory nerve action potential SNAP), dynamometry, pinch gauge readings, and current perception threshold (CPT) scores. An &#034;active&#034; device was provided gratis at the end of the study, with 15 subjects voluntarily remaining within the open protocol an additional 2-10 months and using the preselected primary and secondary parameters. RESULTS: (two months). Of the 31 hands, 25 (13 magnet, 12 sham) had moderate to severe pain (VAS &gt; 4). The VAS and PGIC revealed a nonsignificant pain reduction. NPS analyses (anova) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of &#034;deep&#034; pain (35% downward arrow vs 12% upward arrow, P = 0.018), NPS Total Composite (decreases of 42% vs 24%, P = 0.042), NPS Total Descriptor Score (NPS 8; 43% vs 24%), and NPS 4 (42% vs 11%). Motor strength, CMAP/SNAP, and CPT scores were not significantly changed. Of the 15 hands with up to 10 months of active PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic fields) exposure, there was objective improvement in nerve conduction (CMAP = 53%, SNAP = 40%, &gt;1 SD), and subjective improvement on examination (40%), pain scores (50%), and PGIC (70%). No detectable changes in motor strength and CPT. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF exposure in refractory CTS provides statistically significant short- and longterm pain reduction and mild improvement in objective neuronal functions. Neuromodulation appears to influence nociceptive-C and large A-fiber functions, probably through ion/ligand binding.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777606 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>
<p> 
<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777934&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777934">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.</b></p>
<p>Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3748-58</p>
<p>Authors:  McDannold N, Maier SE</p>
<p>Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging is an elastography method developed for ultrasound imaging that maps displacements produced by focused ultrasound pulses systematically applied to different locations. The resulting images are &#034;stiffness weighted&#034; and yield information about local mechanical tissue properties. Here, the feasibility of magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) was tested. Quasistatic MR elastography was used to measure focal displacements using a one-dimensional MRI pulse sequence. A 1.63 or 1.5 MHz transducer supplied ultrasound pulses which were triggered by the magnetic resonance imaging hardware to occur before a displacement-encoding gradient. Displacements in and around the focus were mapped in a tissue-mimicking phantom and in an ex vivo bovine kidney. They were readily observed and increased linearly with acoustic power in the phantom (R2=0.99). At higher acoustic power levels, the displacement substantially increased and was associated with irreversible changes in the phantom. At these levels, transverse displacement components could also be detected. Displacements in the kidney were also observed and increased after thermal ablation. While the measurements need validation, the authors have demonstrated the feasibility of detecting small displacements induced by low-power ultrasound pulses using an efficient magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequence that is compatible with tracking of a dynamically steered ultrasound focal spot, and that the displacement increases with acoustic power. MR-ARFI has potential for elastography or to guide ultrasound therapies that use low-power pulsed ultrasound exposures, such as drug delivery.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777934 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>

<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>nikken</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/87/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome (magnetic therapy bracelets)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/86</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 07:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61
Authors: 
Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18833174&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18833174">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome</b></p>
<p>Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic therapy. The comparison of the efficacy of treatment in patients of the main and control groups revealed the benefits of transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy in CNS function, performance on memory and attention tests, state of autonomic nervous system and psychoemotional state of patients (the reduction of anxiety and depression).</p>
<p>PMID: 18833174 PubMed - in process</p>
<p>
<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>magnetic bracelets</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/86/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome (nikken)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/85</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/85#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61
Authors: 
Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18833174&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18833174">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic therapy in the complex treatment of alcohol abstinent syndrome</b></p>
<p>Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(9):57-61</p>
<p>Authors: </p>
<p>Fifty-four abstinent alcohol-dependent patients have been studied. Twenty-nine patients (a main group) received, along with basic therapy, a physiotherapeutic treatment (transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy) and 25 patients (a control group) received only basic therapy. The comparison of the efficacy of treatment in patients of the main and control groups revealed the benefits of transcranial dynamic magnetic therapy in CNS function, performance on memory and attention tests, state of autonomic nervous system and psychoemotional state of patients (the reduction of anxiety and depression).</p>
<p>PMID: 18833174 PubMed - in process</p>
<p>
<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><keyword>pulsed magnetic therapy</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/85/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome. (bio magnetic therapy)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/84</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;


 
Related Articles


A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.
Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-504
Authors:  Weintraub MI, Cole SP
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a physics-based combination of simultaneous static and time-varying dynamic magnetic field stimulation to the wrist 4 hours/day for 2 months can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777606&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&amp;sid=nlm:pubmed&amp;issn=1526-2375&amp;date=2008&amp;volume=9&amp;issue=5&amp;spage=493"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www3.interscience.wiley.com-aboutus-images-wiley_interscience_150x34.gif" border="0"/></a> </td>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777606">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.</b></p>
<p>Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-504</p>
<p>Authors:  Weintraub MI, Cole SP</p>
<p>OBJECTIVE: To determine if a physics-based combination of simultaneous static and time-varying dynamic magnetic field stimulation to the wrist 4 hours/day for 2 months can reduce subjective neuropathic pain and influence objective electrophysiologic parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 36 symptomatic hands. Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) and neuropathic pain scale (NPS) scores at baseline and 2 months and a Patient&#039;s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire at the end of 2 months. Secondary endpoints were neurologic examination, median nerve distal latencies (compound muscle action potential CMAP/sensory nerve action potential SNAP), dynamometry, pinch gauge readings, and current perception threshold (CPT) scores. An &#034;active&#034; device was provided gratis at the end of the study, with 15 subjects voluntarily remaining within the open protocol an additional 2-10 months and using the preselected primary and secondary parameters. RESULTS: (two months). Of the 31 hands, 25 (13 magnet, 12 sham) had moderate to severe pain (VAS &gt; 4). The VAS and PGIC revealed a nonsignificant pain reduction. NPS analyses (anova) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of &#034;deep&#034; pain (35% downward arrow vs 12% upward arrow, P = 0.018), NPS Total Composite (decreases of 42% vs 24%, P = 0.042), NPS Total Descriptor Score (NPS 8; 43% vs 24%), and NPS 4 (42% vs 11%). Motor strength, CMAP/SNAP, and CPT scores were not significantly changed. Of the 15 hands with up to 10 months of active PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic fields) exposure, there was objective improvement in nerve conduction (CMAP = 53%, SNAP = 40%, &gt;1 SD), and subjective improvement on examination (40%), pain scores (50%), and PGIC (70%). No detectable changes in motor strength and CPT. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF exposure in refractory CTS provides statistically significant short- and longterm pain reduction and mild improvement in objective neuronal functions. Neuromodulation appears to influence nociceptive-C and large A-fiber functions, probably through ion/ligand binding.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777606 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>
<p> 
<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777934&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777934">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.</b></p>
<p>Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3748-58</p>
<p>Authors:  McDannold N, Maier SE</p>
<p>Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging is an elastography method developed for ultrasound imaging that maps displacements produced by focused ultrasound pulses systematically applied to different locations. The resulting images are &#034;stiffness weighted&#034; and yield information about local mechanical tissue properties. Here, the feasibility of magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) was tested. Quasistatic MR elastography was used to measure focal displacements using a one-dimensional MRI pulse sequence. A 1.63 or 1.5 MHz transducer supplied ultrasound pulses which were triggered by the magnetic resonance imaging hardware to occur before a displacement-encoding gradient. Displacements in and around the focus were mapped in a tissue-mimicking phantom and in an ex vivo bovine kidney. They were readily observed and increased linearly with acoustic power in the phantom (R2=0.99). At higher acoustic power levels, the displacement substantially increased and was associated with irreversible changes in the phantom. At these levels, transverse displacement components could also be detected. Displacements in the kidney were also observed and increased after thermal ablation. While the measurements need validation, the authors have demonstrated the feasibility of detecting small displacements induced by low-power ultrasound pulses using an efficient magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequence that is compatible with tracking of a dynamically steered ultrasound focal spot, and that the displacement increases with acoustic power. MR-ARFI has potential for elastography or to guide ultrasound therapies that use low-power pulsed ultrasound exposures, such as drug delivery.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777934 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>

<p><keyword>magnetic mattress</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/84/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging. (pulsed magnetic therapy)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/83</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/83#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;



Related Articles


Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.
Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3748-58
Authors:  McDannold N, Maier SE
Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging is an elastography method developed for ultrasound imaging that maps displacements produced by focused ultrasound pulses systematically applied to different locations. The resulting images are &#034;stiffness weighted&#034; and yield information about local mechanical tissue properties. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777934&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">More info&#8230;</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777934">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.</b></p>
<p>Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3748-58</p>
<p>Authors:  McDannold N, Maier SE</p>
<p>Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging is an elastography method developed for ultrasound imaging that maps displacements produced by focused ultrasound pulses systematically applied to different locations. The resulting images are &#034;stiffness weighted&#034; and yield information about local mechanical tissue properties. Here, the feasibility of magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) was tested. Quasistatic MR elastography was used to measure focal displacements using a one-dimensional MRI pulse sequence. A 1.63 or 1.5 MHz transducer supplied ultrasound pulses which were triggered by the magnetic resonance imaging hardware to occur before a displacement-encoding gradient. Displacements in and around the focus were mapped in a tissue-mimicking phantom and in an ex vivo bovine kidney. They were readily observed and increased linearly with acoustic power in the phantom (R2=0.99). At higher acoustic power levels, the displacement substantially increased and was associated with irreversible changes in the phantom. At these levels, transverse displacement components could also be detected. Displacements in the kidney were also observed and increased after thermal ablation. While the measurements need validation, the authors have demonstrated the feasibility of detecting small displacements induced by low-power ultrasound pulses using an efficient magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequence that is compatible with tracking of a dynamically steered ultrasound focal spot, and that the displacement increases with acoustic power. MR-ARFI has potential for elastography or to guide ultrasound therapies that use low-power pulsed ultrasound exposures, such as drug delivery.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777934 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>
<p> 
<p><small><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pulsed+Magnetic+Therapy" rel="tag" target="_blank" title="Pulsed Magnetic Therapy">Pulsed Magnetic Therapy</a></small></p>
<p><B><A href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&#038;db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Retrieve&#038;list_uids=18777606&#038;dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.</A></B><br />
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&amp;sid=nlm:pubmed&amp;issn=1526-2375&amp;date=2008&amp;volume=9&amp;issue=5&amp;spage=493"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www3.interscience.wiley.com-aboutus-images-wiley_interscience_150x34.gif" border="0"/></a> </td>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Display&amp;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&amp;from_uid=18777606">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome.</b></p>
<p>Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):493-504</p>
<p>Authors:  Weintraub MI, Cole SP</p>
<p>OBJECTIVE: To determine if a physics-based combination of simultaneous static and time-varying dynamic magnetic field stimulation to the wrist 4 hours/day for 2 months can reduce subjective neuropathic pain and influence objective electrophysiologic parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 36 symptomatic hands. Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) and neuropathic pain scale (NPS) scores at baseline and 2 months and a Patient&#039;s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire at the end of 2 months. Secondary endpoints were neurologic examination, median nerve distal latencies (compound muscle action potential CMAP/sensory nerve action potential SNAP), dynamometry, pinch gauge readings, and current perception threshold (CPT) scores. An &#034;active&#034; device was provided gratis at the end of the study, with 15 subjects voluntarily remaining within the open protocol an additional 2-10 months and using the preselected primary and secondary parameters. RESULTS: (two months). Of the 31 hands, 25 (13 magnet, 12 sham) had moderate to severe pain (VAS &gt; 4). The VAS and PGIC revealed a nonsignificant pain reduction. NPS analyses (anova) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of &#034;deep&#034; pain (35% downward arrow vs 12% upward arrow, P = 0.018), NPS Total Composite (decreases of 42% vs 24%, P = 0.042), NPS Total Descriptor Score (NPS 8; 43% vs 24%), and NPS 4 (42% vs 11%). Motor strength, CMAP/SNAP, and CPT scores were not significantly changed. Of the 15 hands with up to 10 months of active PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic fields) exposure, there was objective improvement in nerve conduction (CMAP = 53%, SNAP = 40%, &gt;1 SD), and subjective improvement on examination (40%), pain scores (50%), and PGIC (70%). No detectable changes in motor strength and CPT. CONCLUSIONS: PEMF exposure in refractory CTS provides statistically significant short- and longterm pain reduction and mild improvement in objective neuronal functions. Neuromodulation appears to influence nociceptive-C and large A-fiber functions, probably through ion/ligand binding.</p>
<p>PMID: 18777606 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE</p>

<p><keyword>magnetic health</keyword></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulsedmagnetictherapy.net/pulsed-magnetic-therapy-does-not-use-magnets/83/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
